Top 5 Juma (Team-GPT) Alternatives (2026)

Companies look for a Juma alternative for reasons Juma’s own pages state. Team-GPT is now Juma, and its LLM info page describes an AI workspace and superagent “purpose-built for marketing teams and agencies”. Your team works in Juma’s own app; Microsoft Teams is one of more than 3,000 entries on its integrations page. Its agents, by its custom agents page, are all “triggered the same way: from the Juma chat”. Its data processing addendum says its “primary processing operations take place in the United States”. And its plans are a monthly credit pool per workspace, from $49 for 5,000 credits; when the balance reaches zero, the workspace pauses new AI conversations until credits are added, according to its credits page.

For a company that bought Team-GPT as AI for everyone and runs on Microsoft Teams, that adds up to a marketing tool in a separate app, data processed in the US and a pool someone has to watch. Here are five alternatives, amaiko first. For the direct head-to-head, see amaiko vs Juma.

1. amaiko: AI for the whole company, inside Teams

amaiko lives in Microsoft Teams, in the chat your company already uses. There is no separate app tab, no browser extension and no new tool to learn. The free trial starts with a Microsoft 365 work account or your company email.

amaiko works for every department. It reads and drafts across Outlook, calendar, OneDrive, SharePoint, Word, Excel and PowerPoint, and a growing marketplace of specialists connects HubSpot, Dynamics 365 Business Central, DocuSign, Personio, Jira, Confluence, DATEV and more. amaiko coordinates them on requests that span several systems.

amaiko builds a persistent corporate memory. Every night it consolidates your team’s conversations into lasting company knowledge: projects, customers, decisions and who knows what. Nobody uploads a brief to keep it current, and when someone leaves, what they knew stays. amaiko teams spend 35% less time searching, and new hires get up to speed 57% faster.

And amaiko works before you ask. Active Inbox reads incoming email and flags what needs attention, flagged emails become to-dos, and the morning briefing is ready before you open the chat. It is part of the plan.

amaiko is GDPR-compliant and hosted in Germany on its own infrastructure, not in the Microsoft cloud, with AI processing only inside the EU. Details are on the security page. It costs €41.58 per user per month billed annually (€499 per user per year), or €49.90 monthly, from five seats, with unlimited tokens: a 10-person company pays €4,990 a year, and a heavy month costs the same as a quiet one. See pricing.

Book a demo to see amaiko in your own Teams, or get amaiko and start today.

2. ChatGPT Enterprise

ChatGPT Enterprise is OpenAI’s company plan. Its price is not published: the pricing page sends you to sales. Your team works in ChatGPT. Its Microsoft Teams app connects Teams to ChatGPT so it can search your chats on request, and your Microsoft Entra admin has to approve its permissions.

Full comparison: amaiko vs ChatGPT Enterprise.

3. Langdock

Langdock is a model-agnostic chat, agent and workflow platform in its own app, in the browser or on the desktop, that also answers in Teams through a bot; conversations there do not appear in the Langdock web app’s history. Its price calculator shows a Business seat at €23.20 per user per month billed annually, within session and weekly usage limits, and Business Max, with five times those limits, at €99. Its terms name Frankfurt on Microsoft Azure for data, and say models with a “global” deployment may run inference outside the EU.

Full comparison: amaiko vs Langdock.

4. meinGPT

meinGPT is an AI platform with chat, assistants and meeting notes. Its price page shows €18 per user per month for up to 50 users, with the 10% annual discount included. Model costs are not in that price; the calculator adds a model budget on top, preset at €2.31 per user. Your team works in meinGPT’s own interface: its Teams connector is read-only and does not post messages.

Full comparison: amaiko vs meinGPT.

5. Dust

Dust is a platform for building AI agents on company data. Its pricing page shows a Pro seat at €24 per user per month billed yearly, €30 monthly, with 8,000 credits a month; the Max seat for power users costs €120 billed yearly. When the credits run out, usage continues only through overage an admin has enabled, up to a cap. Dust answers in Teams through a bot that an admin uploads as a custom app, and its agents are built by your team.

Full comparison: amaiko vs Dust.

See it in your own Teams

Each of the other four alternatives is built around its own app. amaiko works in the one your team already has open. Book a demo and ask amaiko your own questions.